City SUV comparison test: MG ZS v Mazda CX-3 v Renault Captur v Ford EcoSport

24 August 2018, 11:26 am

The Other Dimension
City SUV comparison test: MG ZS v Mazda CX-3 v Renault Captur v Ford EcoSport
Image: Drive
Drive logo
City SUV comparison test: MG ZS v Mazda CX-3 v Renault Captur v Ford EcoSport
Image: Drive

AutoExec Summary

Building a car from scratch involves deciding the class it fits into, drawing inspiration, and selecting features. MG faced these questions when developing the ZS, targeting the city SUV segment. The ZS shares design elements with Mazda’s CX-3, an engine similar to Ford’s EcoSport, and a soft suspension akin to Renault’s Captur. Despite a challenging start for Chinese cars in Australia, MG aims to compete with established brands. The Mazda CX-3 offers strong safety features and a refined interior but suffers from engine noise and tight rear seats. Ford’s EcoSport, despite past issues, is spacious and fun to drive. Renault’s Captur excels in design and ride quality but lacks rear curtain airbags. The MG ZS impresses but has safety concerns.

Brands mentioned: MG, Mazda, Ford, Renault, Chery, Great Wall

MEMBER ACCESS

NOT A MEMBER?

Subscribe now to see all the day’s headlines and more

Share Article

"*" indicates required fields

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form